Clement Chidekh vs Marvin Moeller Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Mar at 07:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Chidekh vs M. Moeller

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Moeller
They have played 2 sets in total, with Clement Chidekh winning 2 and Marvin Moeller winning 0. The last match between Clement Chidekh and Marvin Moeller was at the M25 Saint-Dizier, 26-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chidekh | 1 |
| Moeller | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Saint-Dizier(03-26-25)
C. Chidekh vs M. Moeller H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.42% (193-102) | Career Total W/L | 62.64% (228-136) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Chidekh vs M. Moeller Match Preview:
Analyzing second serve performance in recent form, Chidekh shows a slightly stronger edge by winning 46.18% of points, while Moeller trails with 41.27%. This specific metric is highly correlated with overall match prediction accuracy, providing significant insights into the expected outcomes.
When examining return game statistics, Chidekh has consistently won 49.24% of their opponent's second serve points, just ahead of Moeller, who stands at 48.47%. However, Moeller outperforms in first serve returns, winning 25.88% of points compared to Chidekh’s 25.2%. These figures are imperative for understanding who might have the upper hand in head-to-head matchups.
The ability to save breakpoints is crucial under pressure. Moeller demonstrates resilience by saving 55.77% of breakpoints in recent matches, surpassing Chidekh’s 52.74%. This aspect can be particularly useful for in-game betting strategies, providing insights into each player's mental fortitude during crucial moments.
Assessing their performance overview, Chidekh has a win-loss record of 43-31, translating to a 58.11% win rate over the past year. Moeller, however, has a slightly better record, with a 62.5% win rate, boasting 30 wins to 18 losses. These statistics present an overall view of their head-to-head prediction.
Examining surface preferences, Chidekh’s best career surface is Hard, achieving a win rate of 69%, whereas Moeller’s strongest performance is on indoor hard courts with a 66% win rate. It is worth noting that Moeller’s weakest performance comes on Hard courts with a 53% win rate.
In terms of player level, Chidekh has mostly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K in the last year, securing a win rate of 76.92%. Moeller has competed in similar events with a marginally higher success rate of 79.31%. This context is essential when comparing player stats as the event level affects the relative competences of the players.
Looking at opponent quality, Chidekh’s competitors have averaged a rank of 358.34 over the past year, while Moeller’s opposition averaged a rank of 396.23. This suggests that Chidekh has faced slightly tougher opponents on average.
Focusing on deciding set performance, if this matchup enters a third set, Moeller holds a solid 63% win rate in deciding sets, while Chidekh has only managed a 42% victory rate. This statistic might prove decisive in close contests, especially for live predictions.
Break point conversion rates in recent form reveal Moeller has converted 32.14% of opportunities, outpacing Chidekh, who converted 28.65%. Such efficiency in capitalizing on break points is indicative of potential strategic advantages during live play.
Considering the comprehensive analysis and the outlined statistical advantages, which include higher breakpoint conversion and better deciding set performance, Moeller stands as the favored contender to secure victory in the upcoming match.
Clement Chidekh vs Marvin Moeller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Chidekh vs M. Moeller H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:12:50 | Average Match Time | 1:12:50 |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve % | 49% (20/41) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14/20) |
| 73% (11/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11/21) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 39% (16/41) | Return Points Win % | 31% (16/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played
M. Moeller Recent Matches Played

C. Chidekh vs M. Moeller Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.42% (193/102) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.64% (228/136) |
| 62.57% (423/253) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.00% (495/330) |
| 55.08% (3418/2787) | Games Win/Loss | 54.25% (4183/3528) |
| 69.01% (98/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.63% (10/9) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.96% (114/73) |
| 64.93% (87/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.82% (104/54) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 668 | Aces Total | 797 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 908 | Total Double Faults | 1058 |
| 1:34:59 | Average Match Time | 1:35:54 |
| 416.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.99 |
| 62% (11627/18724) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14029/22714) |
| 67% (7814/11627) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (9403/14029) |
| 52% (3670/7097) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4312/8685) |
| 46% (1010/2207) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1246/2693) |
| 43% (8330/19357) | Return Points Win % | 44% (10355/23717) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 53.13% (51/45) | Challenger W/L | 54.74% (52/43) |
| 73.51% (136/49) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (176/88) |
| 65% (189/290) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (226/360) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (32/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (46/97) |
| 55% (49/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (59/98) |
| 91% (190/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (221/199) |
| 9% (190/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (221/21) |
| 19% (105/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (143/28) |